Article Related to Cancer Radiation And Low Sodium Levels
ELEVATED DOSES OF RADIATION FROM TSA BODY SCANNERS A REASON FOR DISTRESS
An assembly of specialists articulated their point to Obama’s science and technology adviser John Holdren. Dr. John W. Sedat, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus in the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, UC, San Francisco and a member of the National Academy of Sciences, in a well-thought-out correspondence was joined by three other similarly credentialed faculty members in expressing their concerns in that letter dated April 6, 2010. In that letter they articulated “concerns about the potential serious health risks” about the “the dose to the skin may be dangerously high” that the TSA is subjecting people too at airports around the USA.. In that memo they made it known that radiation intensifies cancer jeopardy by damaging the DNA and several components in the cells.
WHAT THE RADIATION INVADES, NOT THE DOSAGE, IS WHAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE
The scanners the Transportation Safety Administration utilizes focus the majority of the energy on the surface of the skin and go through a few millimeters into the skin. The anxiety is that there are a number of very radiation-sensitive tissues close to the skin such as testes, eyes, and circulating blood.
When this is taken into account, it seems unreliable to assert that the amount being administered is a thousand times less than a chest X-ray, or, that it is considerably less than what travelers are subjected to in-flight. It is the amount of the tissue exposed that is important when potential effects of radiation damage are evaluated.
ARE YOU, OR SOMEONE YOU CARE FOR, IN ONE OF THESE CATEGORIES?
Infants, young children, pregnant women, seniors, people with impaired immunity (those with HIV infection, cancer patients, people with immune deficiency disorders, and people with abnormal DNA repair mechanism are some categories of people that are at a much higher risk than others. At this time the TSA is not differentiating between these groups and others based on the hazards.
Elderly are also in a distinctivecategory when it comes to radiation exposure. Their DNA accumulates a significant amount of unrepaired harm, to the point where even small doses of radiation can start the growth of skin cancers, as well as melanoma which can have the potential of becoming deadly. Exposing their eyes to low doses of radiation is also a concern, since exposure to radiation could raise their peril of developing cataracts.
WE CAN’T RELY ON THE PROFESSIONALS
Recall when the American College of Radiology reassured us that the CT scans were safe and sound and that the radiation was the equivalent of one chest X-ray. At the present we have learned that the dose that is in a CT scan is equal to 1,000 chest X-rays. Based on the past, it can pretty much be predicted that when the real effects of these full body scanners on healthiness become identified, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano and the remainder of the “officials” who contend the scanners are safe will no longer be around.